DESIGN OF A LIFE
ANIL MITRA PHD, Copyright © Anil Mitra 1986, REVISED May 2003
Document status: May 29, 2003
Outdated; maintained out of interest
No further action needed for Journey in Being
I have not edited this document for style
CONTENTS
1.2.1 Outline
of basis, method, and priorities of design
2 Philosophical Basis for Design
2.6 An
Organization of The Dimensions Of Being
3 Psychological Basis For Design
3.1 Dimensions
Of Being And Growth
3.1.2 Interpretations
of The Dimensions Of Being And Growth
3.1.2.1 Maslow’s
interpretation
3.1.2.2 Becker’s
interpretation
3.1.2.3 Eastern
interpretations
3.2 The Process of Growth and ts Dynamics
3.2.1 Openness to Being: Awareness and Perception
3.2.2 Blocks to Awareness: Resolution
3.3 Eastern Traditions: Buddhism, Vedanta, Yoga
3.3.1 Philosophy and psychology of Buddhism
3.3.1.1 A
Western interpretation
3.3.1.2 An
outline of Buddhism
3.3.2 Vedanta:
the Existential Philosophy-Psychology of the Upanishads
3.3.2.1 Outline
of Indian Philosophy
3.3.2.3 Advaitya
Vedanta: the monism of Samkara
3.4 Conclusion
Individuals nd Society
The origins of this outline of personal design, based in
knowing and self-awareness, dreams and vision, are in the development of my own
sense of purpose. As this sense became varied and at the same time more
explicit, I felt a need to center it and at the same time give it organization
and unity
My interests and passions have included beauty and service.
Beauty: in nature, humanity, the inner or psychic world, and the universal or
sacred - representing four fundamental areas of relationship; and in human
knowledge of these dimensions - science and humanities. Service: to these
dimensions through exploration, adventure, discovery, unification, application,
and through transmission of which education is an aspect
Among my interests have been philosophy, psychology and design. The unity, or inseparability, from a functional viewpoint, of philosophy, psychology, and design becomes clear--a problem of academic specialization. These interests provide some main threads of the centering and unity. Philosophy does so by showing the dimensions of experience, relationship, knowledge, and by providing an essential unity; psychology by showing or mirroring this unity in humans and by pointing to human will to the miraculous, to our highest being, and by showing the blocks to this development. Design by providing an efficient method to organize and unify the multifold aspects of my development and to provide an approach to choices for the future. To a significant degree, the philosophy, psychology, and design me personal
The purposes of this outline are:
·
Unify and organize my personal design: the main
areas of content and method me stated in Chapter 1.t; to these 1 add the
necessity of self-knowledge and growth
·
Provide the initial design in outline; provide
implementation for projects and priorities
·
Provide a philosophy of personal design: in
outline this will include the philosophy, psychology and method: this is
inherent to this outline article. Further development may be appropriate. A
partial basis is my essay “Life, Unity, and Meaning”
Philosophical basis: chapter 2
·
The basic dimensions of being are the natural,
social, inner w physic, universal w sacred. The basic processes of personal,
social and universal transition are awareness [vision --> values -->
needs and wants] --> knowledge [process] --> design and planning -->
action --> control --> evaluation --> feedback
·
The unity of basic dimensions and processes are
seen through necessity [humans, unitary beings, are of the universe], through
structure and hierarchy, and through evolution. Implications for the individual
are that for full health all dimensions of being are essential: humans art
healthy when we attempt to be our highest being
Psychological basis: chapter 3
Based in philosophy, and also empirically, for full health
humans must integrate the dimensions of being for these are manifest in our
environment and mirrored in our self. The progression of growth is natural
--> social --> inner --> universal. These reflect the dimensions of
human need, wants, values, and vision
A process of transition is the cycle of awareness -->,...,--> feedback. Awareness is fundamental and there are
many traditional systems. Essentially, awareness is openness to truth and
centering of the self in creation. The dual process is of opening the sell to
its highest potential and of working with blocks to openness
The universal includes what is unknown and the realm of the
unknown exceeds the realm of the known. So, openness to the universal is highly
practical
There is value in dissipation and play
Method and design: Chapter 4
There are appropriate balances of ‘be”-ing and design
[method]: and appropriate diversities. These me consequences of philosophy and
psychology
The method is a system of priorities, which includes a
hierarchy of needs spanning the natural...to the...universal. This system
naturally includes “be”-ing, awareness, play and so on. The basic process
awareness --> knowledge -->...is a priority. Control in the sense of
centering is also a priority. The priorities are hierarchized, but only partially--because
of the unknown: this could be formalized
A separate, practical, compact and portable lilt of active
priorities is kept, their hierarchy implied. Also included: centering: and
noting new thoughts
Where appropriate, action will Imply] be specified
Priorities: Chapter 5
Categories of project according to philosophy, psychology,
and method and design
A partial list/hierarchy of priorities: more complete list
of ongoing [including currently inactive] projects in “projects” Tile
Urgent/emergency situations...could be an implicit/explicit
part of the hierarchization
These projects and priorities are mine: their organizations
reflect my needs--specifically my interests are diverse
The basic dimensions of being those humans can recognize
are:
Natural
Social or artifactual--and secular
Inner or psychic, and
Universal or sacred
These dimensions represent stages in evolution. The natural
presents the material nature of things: physical, chemical and biological. Thus
the “brain” is natural. The social level is an outcome of the natural but is
most conveniently described, not in terms of material properties, but in terms
of hierarchic-emotional-cognitive interactions within a group of organisms. Such
interactions have a basis in the natural, no doubt: but such a basis of
description would be enormously complex and of little value. A hierarchy of
intermediate descriptions could provide a convenient unity. The distinction is,
in part, one of convenience and appropriateness of description
Since the relationship and structures within the social
world, and the byproduct8 of the social world are created, are products of the
social interactions and invention: this world can also be called artifactual.
The artifacts, natural and institutional, have value and this value is highly
dependent on the nature of the social individual
The inner or psychic world is, to a significant degree, an
artifact of society. The child begins to absorb cultural meaning at a pre-symbolic/analytic
stage of development, thus the individual’s sense of being is not merely
cognitive-emotive but highly organismic, and, so, the artifactual nature of
reality is largely hidden from the symbolic self. Additionally the individual’s
stability is dependent on this artifactual sense of self and reality, therefore
difficult to question
Despite the highly artifactual sense of sell of individuals
in society, the individual can attempt to decipher what is real. The dimensions
of reality include the reality of nature including the real nature of the
organism--the body; the reality of social meaning and interaction; and the
reality of the self. One of the reasons why such a reality is valuable is that
the entire structure of artifactual meaning is context dependent. The context
is the inner or the relationships within society, and the outer w
environmental. Changes in context undermine the artifactual. But this is why
emergence from artifactual reality is so difficult. Because social structure is
so dependent on the individual’s absorption in social meaning, this meaning
must have a firm hold on the individual. The universal provides a base for
reality. Meanings of the universal include:
Physical universe,
Truth behind artifactual or created meaning,
Transcendence of the social self,
The unknown in nature, humans, self, and cosmos
In the sense of the unknown, the universal is neither good
nor evil. It is unknown not only in the sense of ignorance but in that it
represents as yet unfulfilled evolutionary pathways and so there is no
individual, species or organismic basis for its knowledge. And because there is
more unknown than known, openness to the universal is good. This is not a
contradiction, for the use of good and evil in the first sentence of this
paragraph is in an artifactual sense
In the sense of the truth behind created meaning, the value
is in critical choices for society and individual
The physical universe is our home. Here were we created and
here is our final meaning and destiny. When the world fails, this remains
Transcendence of the social-self is the path to the universal, first in the self and then through transcendence of the true self to the universal in the cosmic
The basic processes of personal, social and universal
transition me:
Awareness [vision: visions and dreams --> values --> wants and needs] --> knowledge [processes] --> design and planning --> implementation or action --> control --> evaluation --> feedback
I have written the essay Life. Unity, and Meaning as a philosophical basis of [personal] decision. This
essay shows the basis of the basic dimensions [2.l] and processes [2.3] in
evolution. The basic dimensions correspond to the fundamental structure of
evolution, and the basic processes are the adaptive processes of these
structures. The processes of Chapter 2.3 correspond to human [social], personal
[inner, self], and universal levels
Since evolution builds by differentiating basic structures,
adaptively specializing and integrating. There is an organic, evolutionary
unity to the basic structures and processes. A philosophical basis is in the
fact that humans [life] is unitary and therefore the
universes of perception and being must be identical, and this single universe
must be a web of interconnections. The essay [LUM] discusses, more fully,
foundations and details of this unity and its value
A vision [value] related question I have considered is that of design in the universe. The argument, in outline, is: the origin of life and human consciousness is in evolution; humans do play a role in our own design--if limited and “imperfect”: for design and purpose on large scales, no new concept is needed--only new scales of time and space; we may be[come] a part of a larger scale: consciousness is a necessary agent of life’s independence from its own evolutionary past--the conscious individual is being in microcosm. The probabilities of these arguments are to be based in the unitary nature of the universe
The essential value is the reduction of alienation. Humans
are aware of, live in, and appreciate the full dimensions of being. Our use of
resources is balance and contained
The individual has free choice in determining which realms
he wants to identify with and assign reality status. I felt it worthwhile to
offer him the insight that his personal design for life should include designs,
as far as his power permits, for his wider system: and information, as far as
his knowledge permits, of that wider system. I also felt it valuable to offer
for his consideration the idea of search for the broadest and highest of all
possible views. I offer only a search, for the view in this essay is not a
detailed one of the universal but an abstract of it..
When each individual fills in the details of the dimensions of being according to their own true vision, they fulfill themselves and contribute to the adaptive potential of the community
Corresponding to the interactions for humans, the four
levels of being--nature. Society. Psychic.
And universal--are four levels of relationship--humanity-nature. Human-human, human- self, and human-universe. The order of
evolution and the order of development [Chapter 3] correspond to the order
stated here
An organization in terms of
levels of inclusiveness is:
|
Universal-sacred
[humanity and cosmos] |
Vision |
|
World-secular
[human and human; human and nature] Social [and
psychological] Technical
[technology] Environment |
Values |
|
Individual-personal
[human and self] Material,
biological, and psychological |
Needs and wants |
I do not distinguish between needs and wants. Values are
needs and wants at the world level. By vision I mean needs, rants,
values and knowledge at the universal level...at this level then is no
distinction between values and knowledge
A possible misinterpretation of self-focus is “selfishness’.
A human’s first sense of self is social, and focus on this self is focus on
social meaning. Focus on further development of self. Though not always
successful, is the essential source of insight for society and individual. And
if the individual becomes trapped in the vicissitudes of this transition, it
may be that the organismic “indoctrination” is too complete. When the
transition is complete the individual is free--their vision is true--and.
though the individual may be perceived as a threat to the established order.
They are a source of true freedom. Their source of freedom as a free being is
their vision into the universal or appropriately, the sacred
Philosophical considerations have shown the basic dimensions of being and the process of growth dong these dimensions. Psychological considerations will show us [1] the meaning of these dimensions of being for humans and the basis of the natural progression of growth of our psychology [and biology], and [2] the psychodynamic problems of the growth process--giving insight int