|
The Way of Being Anil Mitra Copyright, 2002 – 2023 Updated – June 4, 2023 Website since 1999 Home | Pdf for print | Web edition About the summaries The way of being is about discovering and living in truth. What is truth and what is true? In this work the universe and its beings are found limitless, this limitlessness or ultimate is immanent in the world, and, so, to live in truth is to live in immediate and ultimate worlds as one. The summaries pave the way into the narrative, speak to its truth, and inspire seeking toward ultimate. Demonstration and elaboration are deferred to the main text. Knowledge is meaning realized. Search for knowledge occurs in a dual space of concepts and objects. The universe, the void, and limits The universe is all being. The universe is a being—i.e., it exists. An abstract or ideal metaphysics Logic as abstraction from ordinary inference Together, accomplishing the aims above justifies the derivation of the abstract metaphysics. The universe as a field of experiential being. Individual consciousness is ultimate, immanent in the person. Consequences of limitlessness for being and beings The pure dimension of the world is Experiential being in form and formation. The pragmatic dimensions are—the natural, the social, and the universal-ultimate
The Way of Being Overview of The Way of BeingSynopsisExplanationsAn intuitive way of understanding limitlessness is to see that the laws and limits of nature are immanent in nature and have no application to the void. Limitlessness includes or implies— The universe has identity. The universe and its identity phases in and out of ultimate or peak being and the void state or nonbeing (which contains no being), all beings merge as one in the peaks. The variety, extension, duration, and peaks of being are without limit. There is no time, space, or beinghood in phases of the void, which is nonbeing; in the void an eternity and an instant are the same. Our empirical cosmos with its physical laws is but one of limitlessly many with limitless variety of age, size, and laws. They experience phases of relative isolation but are ultimately in contact with one another and with the void or ground state. Our world is one possibility; it does not experience all possibilities. The limits we experience are real but not absolute and transcended in this life, perhaps rarely, or beyond death. In birth we came from limitlessness, perhaps remote; in death we return. That the world does not experience all possibilities is true while it remains within its real but non-absolute limits. There are intelligent, effective, and enjoyable pathways to the ultimate in and from our world (to enjoy is to appreciate as best possible, pleasure, pain, and all faculties of being). Pleasure and pain are unavoidable; pleasure is effective when experienced on pathways—but they also serve who only stand and wait; a most effective approach pain is the path into which therapy is woven (therapy is not an end in itself, not an alternate to process, but is an element of process, part of realization). To be on a pathway is not to devalue our world or to diminish its significance. Proper pathways promote the value and wellbeing of our world. This ultimate knowledge is well enhanced by what is true in received traditions of knowledge, exploration, paths, and pathways. The way of being develops enhanced and interwoven knowledge or real metaphysics and pathway (here, ‘the real metaphysics’ is the name of the developed metaphysical system; in the literature, the term has other, related uses—see how to do real metaphysics). An outline of pathway programs is— Everyday—everyday action is a flexible daily routine attending to development and execution of a way of realization, and physical and experiential yoga. Therapy shall be an integration of the way and the best current therapeutic practice. Universal—everyday to life , with focus on the dimensions of being. Focus on nature is via experiential travel and living in wilderness; focus on the social dimension is via action in its sub-dimensions; focus on the ultimate is via sharing and action toward the ultimate. Essential sections for the wayEssential sections for this brief edition are— Experience, meaning and knowledge, being and existence, the universe, the void, and limits, possibility, an abstract or ideal metaphysics, the universe as a field of experiential being, consequences of limitlessness for limited beings, peak being (god), the real metaphysics, pathway, and references. PrologueThough we human beings live in an apparently limited world, we attempt to live with limits as they are understood and to transcend them. The way has origins in (i) this attempt (ii) reading in history and culture (iii) experience, exploration, and learning (iv) imaginative and critical reflection and narrative on these issues. The aim of the way is discovery and realization, as far as possible, of the ultimate in and from the immediate world (it is not a prescription to be followed, but is reasoned, requires process, and taking part in the process is an element of realization), in a manner that promotes the entire world—the immediate, the ultimate, and their mesh. In advance of discovery, we do not know whether focus should be on destiny or history but will find that in their ultimate meanings they are equivalent. This endeavor is an aim of being. SourcesThough it owes much to its sources, which will be clear to readers familiar with western and eastern thought, the work is presented as a contribution to thought and ways of being. This brief edition has a limited set of inline links, which are cited in the references. For a more sources, see a longer edition. Reading The Way of BeingAs the narrative aims beyond received knowledge and ways of being and understanding in fact (e.g., the extent and duration of the universe), kind (the kind of beings and constituents of the universe), and ways of thought (what it is to be empirical, or rational, or pragmatic), its concepts necessarily go beyond received meaning. So, for precision, and to understand the narrative, its system of defined meanings should be followed, and it should be endeavored to absorb the formal system and its meaning to intuition. The worldview of the way will be unfamiliar to many readers, academic and other: to absorb the view, they may need to (i) recognize their explicit and tacit received worldviews, see their truth as pertaining to a limited domain, and apply effort to seeing that truth as nested in an inclusive truth (ii) reeducate their formal understanding and intuition. A later section on references provides links to material with greater detail, which may assist in understanding the work. Small capitals indicate important terms (read an immediately following ‘is’ as “is defined as”). To help with understanding, the table of contents has summaries and so functions as a simple overview and way into the narrative. The worldThe world, as we see it, begins in standard received worldviews. The common standard received views are secular, which is empirical, and transsecular, which attempt to go beyond the empirical. The secular views emphasize the empirical as source of truth; its values are based in the position that we are capable of morality without religion. Secular views are not dogmatic except when it is insisted that they are the entire truth, i.e., that the empirical world is the entire universe. If our observation does not extend to the entire universe—and we will see that it cannot—the secular views must be incomplete. The transsecular views are religious and metaphysical. The religious, thus far, tend to dogma in cosmology (e.g., god the creator, universal chain of causation, universe as consciousness, and so on), and cosmology as the source of values. The metaphysical are conceptual, which are constructs that may be hypothetical in agreeing with the range of relevant experience so far or rational in being shown to agree with all possible relevant experience (that metaphysics can be rational will be shown by constructing such a metaphysics). The received views have truth but are not the entire truth. Their picture of the universe, even where it has reality, is an extremely limited local picture. Though there is no final consensus on the views, they have a common core, which speaks of the human situation, the immediate and the ultimate, and acceptance and seeking. Both acceptance and seeking ultimates are human values. ExperienceExperience, consciousness, and awarenessIn its first meaning here, Experience is conscious awareness in all its forms. Experience is real, and there is experience of experience. Experience is relationalExperience is relational. This may be spelled out as follows—The relational elements of an experience are the-experience-of — the-experience itself and — the-experienced. That is—experience relates the two relata (or sides), the knower (the knowing subject that has the experience of, intrinsic or inner aspect, of the psyche, or experiential, metaphorically labeled ‘of mind’—as if of mind or psyche) and the known (the known object that is the experienced, instrumental or outer aspect, of the external world, which is better regarded as the object aspect of the world, metaphorically labeled ‘of matter’—as if of matter; later, these ‘as ifs’ may be dropped for pragmatic purposes).. Even what is called pure experience is relational—the relation is internal to the aware being (that without internality cannot have interaction—which may seem contradictory on a particle ontology but is not so on a field ontology). There is experience of experience (I know I am aware) and (i) this is the source of knowledge of the reality of experience (the fact is not proven, rather, it is a given and ‘experience’ is here used a name for this given) (ii) thus experiences are also capable of being experienced—and at least most of what we think of as conscious experiences are—and therefore, experience is as real as anything, particularly the—as if—material. Experience is the place of our beingExperience is the place of our real being and sense of significance (or meaning in the sense of ‘the meaning of life’) of the world and all that is in it. The universe will be found to be experiential—We will be seen to be experiential beings in an experiential universe. Experience is also the place of concept and linguistic meaning and knowledge. Meaning and knowledgeMeaningHere, ‘meaning’ refers to concept and linguistic meaning. To avoid confusion ‘significance’ was used earlier to talk of ‘the meaning of life’. An object, also perhaps as if, is that to which concept refers (real object), may refer, or seems to refer but is not real (literary, symbolic, or fictional object). In the case of meaning, below, there is also an intention to refer. A meaning is a concept and its possible objects (intention may be included but is not explicitly essential here). A sign is an object that, in itself has no meaning—but is in fact or potentially associated with meaning by use, convention, or definition. Linguistic meaning is concept meaning, supplemented by association with a sign; the concept and sign may be elementary or complex and the sign-concept is a symbol. Thus, linguistic meaning is a symbol and its possible objects. KnowledgeKnowledge is meaning realized. Search for knowledge occurs in a dual space of concepts and objects. On abstractionWe saw that there is experience, even though there is illusion for (i) illusion concerns details of intended objects, but, regarding experience itself, the detail is irrelevant, for experience of experience is beyond question (else discussion of experience would not even arise) (ii) except perhaps for illusion, but illusion is experiential. Generally, it will be found that abstraction is a key to perfect knowledge in the sense of perfect faithfulness of concepts to objects (in a correspondence sense). But, obviously, perfection in this sense cannot be claimed for the concrete. Yet (i) abstraction will be a framework of perfection (ii) which will reveal an ultimate though not exclusive value and an associated ultimate criterion for knowledge according to which the join of the abstract and the concrete form a perfect union and (iii) this places received metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and logic in context; it does not invalidate them. Thus, for abstraction as conceived here, there is a sense in which it is more real than the concrete, but that the ideal value restores some of the reality of the concrete. Being and existenceGiven a concept that has (real) reference, what is referred to is an existent whose name is the same as that of the concept—and existence is the property of existents as existents. We then say, existents (and only existents) exist. Then, a being is that which exists, an existent (plural—beings), i.e., a real object, and being is existence. Thus, an example of an existent (or being), given later, is the universe, whose conception is all being. The universe, the void, and limitsStandard received concepts of the universe and the void are indefinite. This results in extreme limits on ability to think clearly on its extent, duration, and variety. This section rectifies that situation and goes toward metaphysics where metaphysics would otherwise seem impossible. The universe is all being (over all markers of situation such as those to which our measures of space and time are approximations, and any others). The following is evident. The universe is a being—i.e., it exists. The void, if in fact the following defines a being—i.e., a real object, is the being that contains no beings—i.e., the void is the absence of manifest being. The void is a being, for its existence and nonexistence are equivalent. That is, the void exists and does not exist—i.e., we assert the truth of a contradiction (doubt about the proof is addressed, especially, in an abstract or ideal metaphysics). In standard logic the truth of a contradiction implies that all assertions admitted to the particular logical universe are true. This would seem to deflate the claims at the beginning of the paragraph. On the other hand, since the void is nothingness, the claim does not seem to defy real possibility. The form of the assertion is that of a contradiction and that it should have reference or truth is apparently impossible and absurd. The apparent contradiction and its seeming absurdity are briefly noted in an aside—the next paragraph—but are defused later. A dialetheia (‘two-way truth’, see dialetheism) is a true contradiction and dialetheism is the view that there are true dialetheia. If there are true dialetheia, particularly the one above, special treatment is necessary. Resolution of the issue is deferred to dialetheia. A true law of nature, limit, or constraint on a being is something that, in its nature, it must follow (laws) or cannot be or achieve (limits and constraints)—that is, a limit is immanent in the being. In other terms, a limit or constraint may be conceived, but to be a real constraint, it must be a characteristic of the being. Therefore laws, limits, or constraints exist, or have being—i.e., laws are beings. PossibilityA being’s existence has conceptual possibility if there is nothing in its conception alone that rules out its existence (since conception refers to no particular world, the structure ruled out by conceptual impossibility would be logically impossible and therefore conceptual possibility is logical possibility). Thus, conceptual possibility is the greatest possibility, that is, possibility in the sense of the greatest inclusivity rather than value, for if not satisfied, existence cannot obtain, regardless of the nature of the world (it is tacit that the case is ideal in that the mode of expression is limitless, the sense of ‘greatest’ is not ‘highest’, but the greatest will include the highest, when it is properly conceived). If, further, nothing in the nature of the universe rules out the being’s existence, it is simply possible, i.e., we say that it has real possibility or just possibility (physical possibility is a case of possibility). A fundamental principleEvery conceptually or logically possible being emerges from the void, for non-emergence of a possible being would be a law of nature of—a limit or constraint on—the void. Therefore— The universe is limitless—the realization of the greatest or logical possibility (and therefore the real and the greatest possibilities are identical). ‘Limitless’ is preferred to ‘infinite’ because the former is most inclusive, i.e., it includes the connotations of the transcendent and the in-process, the actual and the potential, and the absolute vs limited infinities. The assertion in italics above is named the fundamental principle of metaphysics or just the fundamental principle (some consequences important to the way of being will follow). Regarding necessity of a being’s existence as impossibility of its nonexistence, the existence of the limitless universe is necessary. An abstract or ideal metaphysicsThe fundamental principle entails a metaphysics, which, from its abstraction, is perfect, and from its system of concepts, reveals the universe to be without limit of any kind—the realization of possibility in its greatest sense. This section develops the metaphysics and comments on proof under the metaphysics—and doubts about the proof. Consequences are developed later, beginning with the universe as a field of experiential being. The main doubts are (i) empirical—that there is apparent contradiction between the metaphysics and physical cosmology (ii) rational—regarding the proof of the fundamental principle (iii) realist—that the conceptions employed have precise reference (iv) existential—a possible uncomfortable feeling (‘angst’) regarding truth of the metaphysics despite proof. Address of the doubts, in order, is (i) the empirical concern—since physical cosmology is essentially empirical it says nothing about what lies outside it and what lies inside is indeed (trivially) one possibility (ii) the rational question—the essential rational issue is the apparent contradiction ‘the void exists and does not exist’, which is not a contrareal, since it says of the non-manifest that it is non-manifest (iii) realism—is already addressed in the section, on abstraction (iv) the existential—this concern is addressed in the section on doubt and certainty Logic as abstraction from ordinary inferenceThe previous section addresses ‘fact’. The other element of establishing knowledge, inference, is addressed in this section. The propositional calculus satisfies #i, above—it does so by seeing sentences as truth units, each with one of two values, true or false, which, though it is specific (and does not do justice to ordinary reason), is definite and precise via abstraction, and, as it turns out, has significant application, including the derivation of the fundamental principle up to the point where ‘the void exists’ is true and false, which may be addressed via a three valued logic (but which is also addressed by treating ‘the void exists and does not’ outside the universe of standard propositional calculus). In this brief print version of the way, the logical calculi are not developed as they are not necessary to the essential argument, which is presented in the section on dialetheia. The calculi are, however, developed in documents at the website https://www.horizons-2000.org (see references). The universe as a field of experiential beingHere, the concept of experience is extended to all being and deepened to the root of being (root experience is the same as ours in kind but is primitive in quality and variety). That is, experience is universal, which requires (i) that elementary experience is of the same kind, but primitive compared to animal experience (ii) the experientiality of beings is not null but may be zero in value. The extended concept of experience and the abstract metaphysics, together, imply that the universe is a experiential field and that we—humans and higher animals—are focal centers in the field. This section shows and elaborates upon this conclusion. It follows that individual consciousness—i.e., experience—is a part of the ultimate, immanent in the person. There will be concern that this suggests the ultimate is imperfect. But that would be according to unrealistic notions of perfection. There is no reason to expect that in the ultimate, all will be bliss—this is an illusion from human yearning and received worldviews, transsecular and secular. The issue of perfection and its address will be taken up later. We will find perfection, but it will be in a deeper sense. A limitless or substance world would have the character of experientiality (rather than matter), not as in ‘higher being’ (e.g., human, or other animal), but in having its root elements have ‘primitive experientiality’, which, in complex structures such as bodies, combine to constitute experientiality such as in human beings. Such a world would be a field of experiential being in which higher beings are locations of focal experientiality. The main relevance of these conclusions is that (i) since we have shown that the universe is limitless, the universe is an experiential field and (ii) since our cosmos is approximately substance-like, it is approximately an experiential field. This extends the meaning of experience to the root of being, in a dual space of concepts and objects—i.e., both conceptually (in intension) and in its application (in extension). Consequences of limitlessness for being and beingsThe universe has identity; it phases in and out of manifest being; the universe and its identity are limitless in extent, duration, variety, and highest or peak being (which may be a relational process); the variety and duration include cosmoses without limit to number, kind, beginnings, and endings, all in transaction with one another (the degree of transaction will be nil at times) and with the void. All beings inherit limitlessness, for the contrary would be a limit or constraint on the universe; there are of course experienced and real limits on limited beings, which include natural as well as developmental limits, but they are not absolute, for achieving the ultimate (limitlessness) in or from this life, though rare, is absolutely possible; and, if not achieved in this life, it will be attained beyond death; which occurs across migration of identity across, e.g., cosmoses (it is not contradictory for two limited beings to simultaneously become the ultimate, for they merge in doing so); though (contrary to conceptions in which the ultimate is essentially remote) ultimate realization is given: there are intelligent and effective pathways to the ultimate (intelligence being regarded as effective negotiation of the ultimate in and from the immediate). That ultimate realization is given may seem to imply that will be require neither effort nor perseverance nor intelligence; however, this is far from the truth. If the cosmoses are limitless in kind and number, are there not solipsist cosmoses? There are, indeed, and more. There are cosmoses that are nothing more than my knowledge of the world in the present instant-for the instant. However, it is argued later that such cosmoses are non-robust, unstable, numerically rare, and existentially insignificant. How do I know that in this very instant my awareness is not a momentary cosmos? I do not know that, but (i) contingent arguments against it can be given (ii) from the foregoing, we know it is unlikely, and (iii) its effect on my deliberations ought to be twofold—I ought to act as though I am in two worlds, the world of the contingent and the necessary world of the ultimate. enjoyment is appreciation of all aspects of experience (and the world), including perception, cognition, emotion, and pleasure and pain; if enjoyment is an essential value, it is imperative to be on an intelligent path to the ultimate. pleasure and pain (‘suffering’) are unavoidable—the way is not and should not be seen as a guarantee of eternal bliss as a reward for prescribed behavior but, rather, there is no way out of an eternal mix of pleasure and pain and an eternal, if not uniform, path of improvement; perhaps such a guarantee could be seen as a good lie with positive consequences, but I think that the net consequence would be negative and perhaps destructive; pleasure is good, but to seek it excessively for its own sake is diversionary and while entertainment is not to be denied it is good to find entertainment in the world and the way. Though pain is unavoidable, its best address, as far as it is possible and reasonable, is to be on a shared pathway to the ultimate, which is therapeutic in itself and with which the best instrumental therapy interacts and is integrated. The way does not offer eternal release from pain or worlds and lives without pain—it offers an effective approach to and transcendence of the issue of pain. To feel at home, complete, or content, but as process and ends are both good, therapy in itself and achievement ought to be balanced. True compassion is therapeutic and difficult. DialetheiaEarlier the true contradiction or dialetheia (‘two-way truth’, see dialetheism, references for detail), “the void exists and does not exist” was encountered. We saw that with standard logic, such contradictory assertions lead to explosion. This section briefly examines how such apparent dialethic impossibilities may be accommodated without absurdity—without explosion and without world impossibility. Given an object, which, if real, is manifest, “the object exists and does not exist” is a contradiction and specifies an impossible being, and which, in standard logic, would lead to ‘explosion—i.e., that all statements are true (and false). But earlier, we saw that “the void exists and does not exist”. It is a contradiction in form but not in meaning and therefore is and can be true. Such dialetheia (‘two-way truth’). The treatment of dialetheia—and the idea of other formally but not semantically contrareal propositions—is taken up in the more detailed little manual, which has formal resolution in a three valued logic and a direct resolution, which recognizes dialetheia but excludes them from the universe of standard logic. Peak being (god)What is peak being? One term for it is God—but ‘God’ has many meanings and senses. There are limitlessly many Abrahamic, Hindu, and other Gods in far and near corners of the universe (subject to straightening of the narratives), limitlessly many Buddhas. They are neither ultimate nor ultimately robust (for robustness, see the pragmatic dimensions of being). How may we visualize an ultimate and robust god? The abstract metaphysics shows that the highest being is all being and beings in process, while limited, on the way to the limitless ultimate. This requires the following concept of a peak being, which, we might have called ‘god’ but for misleading and contradictory uses of the term. We, all life and being, are part of that process. It is the one, the eternal. Our cosmological corner of the universe is still primitive, on the way to ultimate being—and already there, beyond our situation; even in our situation if it would be seen (we can conceive it with justification—as we are doing here, and sense it, and the conception and sense may reinforce each other). But does this not contradict current physical cosmology, i.e., the view of the empirical universe as originating in a singularity? No, it does not, for while that view has truth, the empirical universe is already immersed in the ultimate. The real metaphysicsThe abstract metaphysics, so far is perfect via abstraction. If pragmatic knowledge is appended to it, the result is an imperfect capture of the real according to received criteria—e.g., in correspondence terms. However, in terms of the ideal revealed by the abstract metaphysics, the join is the best instrument in—and guarantees—realization of the ultimate. In that sense it is perfect, and the result of the join is named ‘the real metaphysics’. This section develops these ideas and reveals the join as a dynamic unity. The abstract metaphysics shows what may be achieved but not how. Tradition shall mean all our pragmatic and pure knowledge. Append this to the ideal content (metaphysics) developed so far. Tradition is the how; imperfect in itself, regarded as in process it is the best we have; therefore, relative to the imperative of realization, it may be truly and realistically be called perfect. In the join, the ideal illuminates and guides the pragmatic and the pragmatic illustrates and is instrumental toward the ideal. The combination, which is thus a dynamic join, is named the real metaphysics, or just the metaphysics. Since tradition is in process, we take elements from diverse cultures and we emphasize the modern west and some elements of Indian philosophy, with the understanding that what we take remains in process, reflectively, experimentally, and is open to and seeking further supplement. We take only certain elements as follows. While the above is ideal, we know from inference to the real metaphysics, that the local need not be ideal. We choose disciplines typical of western culture. The description that follows may seem to derive from a material worldview (i.e., materialism) but may also be derived from and experiential worldview (thus the ideal, the approach from being, the cultures of the east, and the existential thought of the west are not excluded). The elements, named the ‘dimensions of being’ are given in detail in the section, dimensions of being. Dimensions of beingPureThe world is experiential—The pure dimension of the world in process is Experiential being in form and formation of worlds and beings on the way to the limitless ultimate. The essential paradigm of the pure dimension is general logic, described below, and understood to be critical and imaginative. PragmaticSince the ideal picture of realization is given, we choose to complement it with a system of pragmatic knowledge. The chosen local and pragmatic dimensions are from a western materialist view—the natural, the social, and the universal-ultimate, which are laid out in detail in this section. While this seems to be materialistic, the natural and social could be seen in terms of experience and therefore of being-as-such, which, therefore, does not exclude non-western and non-materialist views; and the universal is already seen in terms of being-as-such. Nonetheless metaquestions of the pragmatic dimensions—what they and their elements are and how they are arrived at—remain open. Nature, the ground in this system, has flexible and apparently fixed aspects; sub-dimensions are elementary or physical, complex or living, and experiential as intrinsic ground; which ‘give rise’ to society and creativity, and show nature as more flexible than previously thought. From the natural sciences we derive certain paradigms of form and formation and paradigms of perception and thought. These include incremental change and emergence via variation and selection from biology and mechanism (on determinism-indeterminism continuum) from physics. The paradigms enable understanding of formed and robust cosmoses and beings from the void which exhibit high symmetry and stability and thus effective population of the universe by robust cosmoses with experiential beings. society (community to civilization); sub-dimensions are cultural, geo-political-economic-ethical (universal, global, national, and local), and transsecular, which entails, as we now know, the universal-ultimate. In detail—the cultural encompasses language, custom, science, reason, metaphysics, and human knowledge and exploration, generally, as well as representation and transmission of knowledge, which includes education; social science—structures, e.g. groups and institutions, origins, change, and dynamics of culture and society; economics is about organization and distribution of resources—means and principles; politics concerns group decision and its organization, practical and ideal, whose address is immersive and instrumental (elements of power include: individuals, wealth, economy, institutions, charisma and anti-charisma, force, e.g., military, information, e.g., media); ethics is seen as being about good ideals and ends, right actions, and virtuous behavior and thought, but, though ought to be given weight, the significance of different ethical systems, folk and philosophical, is unclear, and, further, it is not at all clear to what extent and in what manner they universalize: ethics ought to remain experimental and reflective. Paradigms from the social and ethical realm are tentative. Some themes are sustainability vs growth; political-economics and ethics in wealth distribution; theoretical or conceptual ethics, morals, and their relation to choice, decisions and action, for individuals, societies, nations, the world, and the universe (and balance among the same); charisma and institution in power; populism vs liberal democracy in stable and effective governance; power and history; secularism and transsecularism in history and ultimate being. Real metaphysics shows the universal-ultimate (abbreviated to ‘universal’) to be absolutely flexible in its realization of the ultimate. The universal (ultimate) begins with understanding of limitlessness, and yogic and instrumental intention and action toward its realization. It merges with culture in art, science, philosophy, exploration, and spirituality-and-religion-in-an-ideal-sense. It is critical that these disciplines (yoga through religion) be understood not just in terms of their canon but as in process, experimental, subject to reason, informed by the metaphysics, and interactively. Paradigms arising in the universal realm include necessary design (for example, we as beings are on the way to peak capability), necessary cause—premised and spontaneous, and general logic (the logic of the real metaphysics, which includes induction of systems of logic and theories of science and deduction within those systems, and necessary fact as well as pragmatic fact); this brings logic and science closer than might have otherwise been thought. Inasmuch as there is doubt about facts and theories in science, the rational and the empirical are brought closer than we might otherwise think. Given that experience is experiencing, change and its measure are necessary; further form requires extension and its measure; therefore, spacetimebeing is paradigmatic (it does not follow that our measures of spacetime are necessary). Doubt and certaintyOn an existential front, the conclusions of the narrative may be taken as existential attitudes that there is an imperative to pursue, even if the outcome is not guaranteed. On a metaphysical front, the fundamental principle of metaphysics, rather than being regarded as proven, may be taken as a metaphysical postulate. I have been arguing that (a) since received doubt has been removed and (b) the metaphysics has been proven (c) therefore the metaphysics is certain. Yet I remain at the edge of certainty and doubt, (i) because of an ingrained habit of empiricism—though not the ideology (ii) because the proof of the metaphysics is rational, i.e., ontological in the present case, which is not an ingrained habit (but note that though Anselm’s famous ontological proof lacks clear validity, as we are seeing here, ontological proof is not inherently invalid) (iii) existential doubt about the fate of my conscious self remains (iv) doubt is a stance with positive existential and metaphysical aspects. PathwayThough the worldview or metaphysics of the narrative is formally completed, realization is an implementation of the view and, therefore, if metaphysics is seen as an interaction among ideas and action, a program of realization—a pathway—extends the metaphysics. The elements of the program are ‘everyday’ and ‘universal-ultimate’, outlined below and detailed in an adaptable template (see references), also available as a downloadable MS word document. Everyday program—everyday action is a flexible daily routine attending to development and execution of a way of realization, and physical and experiential yoga (received ways), work and relationships, and material and health needs and concerns. The template is designed to be adaptable (1) a range of life situations, cultures, and personal attitudes, (2) varying time schedules and levels of detail (3) ‘normal’ days at a home, work, and play vs ‘special’ days, such as immersion in nature, other cultures, and commitment to and reaffirmation of a worldview and approach to life and action in retreat. An example of immersion in nature is the Tibetan Buddhist practice of beyul (references), i.e., of immersion in remote places, to evoke the inner and outer real) or culture as inspiration and sharing, and retreat whose function includes reinforcement of worldview and renewal of self and commitment. Therapy shall be an integration of the way and the best current therapeutic practice. It will include meditation on compassion for self and others, particularly those who are difficult to like. Universal-ultimate program—everyday to life action via the everyday program, with focus on the dimensions of being. In addition to the everyday—Focus on nature is via exploration, experiential travel, and living in nature (‘the wilderness’), especially beyul (references); focus on the social dimension is via instrumental and immersive action in its sub-dimensions (society and community; culture, knowledge generation and transmission; global through local politics and economics; and the transsecular); focus on the ultimate is via sharing, and instrumental and immersive action toward realization of the ultimate in and from the immediate. A language for metaphysicsContents introduction to a language for metaphysics
A language for metaphysics introduction to a language for metaphysicsPresently, the language is incomplete (i) the vocabulary is near sufficient for the metaphysics of the way (ii) the grammar is an outline of principles and forms (iii) definitions are sparse (iv) comments and explanations stand to be improved and supplemented to provide basis for construction of a metaphysics. function and sourceThe aim is to provide a system (i) adequate to general metaphysics based on criteria of validity, precision, and comprehensiveness (where desired and possible), which shall include ‘rationality’ of the criteria (ii) for the way of being and its metaphysics (iii) from which to develop a database that is updateable and dynamic in allowing automated restructuring from alternate metaphysical perspectives, neutral and substance. The system has been constructed from sources in the history of ideas, experiment in forming a metaphysics that is well founded – ultimate, at least as a framework – and reflexive in having cross reference and consistency of the ideas (including self-reference of the system), application, and correction for internal and empirical consistency. The system initially derives from the metaphysics of the way and will feed back into further and related developments. The initial structure will begin with the subjective given, experience (and as if world, abstracted for precision, and move outward through meaning, knowledge, being, possibility, metaphysics (with value, cosmology, method, and world), and pathway. alternate terminologythe languageGivenness immediacy abstraction naming structure reflexivity self-reflexivity world as if aspects of the world significance the real meaning of life meaning of meaning identity concept relata object psychology dimensions of experience ideal universe and world as field of experiential being elements pragmatic axes inner – outer axis bound – free continuum intensity continuum interaction of the continua form and property form and formation personality concept meaning linguistic meaning language vocabulary lexicon particles phrases grammar—subject-predicate sentence Clause grammar—concept-object abstract-concrete continuum Art general form linguistic form knowledge criteria intention kinds propositional nonpropositional Existence existent existence a being is being significance of being foundation depth breadth beings being itself Concepts nonbeings Logical objects Mereological objects being as being possibility impossibility necessity conceptual possibility logical possibility logical necessity logic propositional logic first order logic higher order logics extended logics deviant logics set theory metaphysics inductive logics real possibility physical human economic real impossibility real necessity greatest possibility paradox limitlessness limitlessness metaphysics the abstract metaphysics fundamental principle the ultimate range of being identity variety individual limits birth death realization peak being dissolution the real metaphysics tradition pragmatic knowledge an ultimate value real metaphysics as knowledge method concept formation, free fact inference demonstration general logic argument validity soundness reason yoga rationality the real this world the ultimate value ethics aesthetics cosmology general cosmology logic concept formation possible worlds substance identity cosmology of form form origins evolution physical cosmology our cosmos evolutionary biology variation and selection paradigms dimensions of being pure pragmatic method general logic search hypothesis construction evaluation reflexivity foundation knowledge problems kinds of knowledge ways primal religion religions abrahamic buddhism hinduism secularism spirituality modern transsecularism morality good evil truth utilitarianism tolerance practice yoga meditation intrinsic instrumental retreat action prayer pathways eightfold way mysticism principles path programs resources return cycle of life birth death narration the future the world as if place of being the immediate possibility limits the ultimate realization aim of being retreat human situation the individual birth death history foresight destiny acceptance seeking search knowledge the real worldview agency action retreat narrative Metanarrative aim audience narrative aim design planning structure universal narrative summation revision historical thread System of the world (encyclopedia) ground humanities tradition religion the universe science sciences history artifact art technology being and the universe ReferencesThe references are for readers and development of the way and its narrative. In this brief edition, the list of resources is limited because space is limited, and use of printed internet addresses is unwieldy. Much more is available at the website for the way of being, https://www.horizons-2000.org/, and the web version of this essay, https://www.horizons-2000.org/2022/secondary/little%20manual.html. The InternetThe references in this section will be useful for development of the way and its publications—and may be useful for readers. The references are few because (i) this is a short print version (ii) internet addresses in print are unwieldy to use (iii) there are many links at the way of being site and in the web version of this essay. Dialetheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Relevant to the discussion of dialetheia, i.e., true contradictions. How to do Real Metaphysics (Against Professional Philosophy). The title of this website will raise some eyebrows, but I refer to it because (i) I think it says something useful (ii) it is relevant to the name, ‘real metaphysics’. In printReading—suggested readings, and a listing of some of my influences. From the way of being, for readers and site developmentThis print version has just a few links; there are many more in the little manual. The way of being site address is https://www.horizons-2000.org. Everyday and universal templates for realization (for html and downloadable Word docm versions of this pdf file, replace ‘pdf’ in the address bar by ‘html’ or ‘docm’). Beyul—the Tibetan Buddhist practice of immersion in remote places to evoke the inner and outer real. External sources for development of the narrativeSome works in print that are used in the development. Haack, Susan, Philosophy of Logics, 1978. Priest, Graham, One: Being an Investigation into the Unity of Reality and of its Parts, including the Singular Object which is Nothingness, 2014. Quine, W.V., Methods of Logic, Fourth Ed., 1982. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, 1953. EpilogueLife is reflection and action. A phase of reflection, though not of inaction, comes to fulfilment; it is now time for a phase emphasizing immersive action and commitment, though not of unreflective life. Narration will continue in-the-world and its foci shall be improvement of the via imagination and criticism, an issue of what I have not seen due to focused seeing in some regions of the real, and universal narrative—i.e., collapsing the essential history of narrative and thought so as to extract what is essential and to have balance against tendencies to infinite detail and the sheer weight of the cumulative record. Death will be unremarkable in itself, but, if, at death, one is incompletely realized, it will be a gateway to the ultimate. |